here is how the recruitment process looks like
We could take a bold hypothesis and amend the stage names :
In CONCLUSION, the stage name is the key issue as it seems to provide confusion. Yet, the process does also loop over and over. We could analyze deeper to provide a more complete answer.
Agenda - Elements from the highlight summary to study :
1 candidate went through 10 stages of candidacy to be hired after 65 days since first entry log. That was his second application.
| candidate_id | job_id | applied_at | length_per_application | entry_log_wait | sum_applications_per_candidate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 69 | 0x58E38E6EE17BF0549F3B3E2C1D20FEBC | 1249559 | 2020-01-15 00:26:00 | 65.0 | 65 | 2 |
In full conclusion ... Is it the process that could be improved? Or the systems to handle business evolution that needed to be scaled up?